Choosing the right handgun is a deeply personal decision, influenced by factors like intended use, hand size, and shooting style. For those considering a Glock in the .40 S&W caliber, the Glock 35 and Glock 22 often top the list. Both offer excellent reliability and performance, but key differences exist that can significantly impact your shooting experience. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which Glock best suits your needs.
Caliber and Capacity: A Foundation for Comparison
The most obvious difference lies in their caliber: the Glock 35 is chambered in .40 S&W, while the Glock 22 is chambered in .40 S&W. While this might seem redundant, it's crucial to understand that while both use the same cartridge, the Glock 35 is designed as a full-size service pistol, offering a longer slide and barrel for improved accuracy and reduced recoil. This leads to a greater capacity – typically 17 rounds in the magazine versus the Glock 22's standard 15-round magazine. However, extended magazines are available for both models, increasing capacity further.
Size and Weight: Ergonomics and Concealed Carry
The Glock 35, being a full-size pistol, is noticeably larger and heavier than the Glock 22, which is considered a compact model. This size difference significantly impacts how each firearm handles and feels.
-
Glock 35: Its larger grip and longer barrel contribute to increased stability and reduced felt recoil, making it ideal for range shooting and more demanding situations. The extra weight helps mitigate muzzle flip. However, its size makes concealed carry more challenging.
-
Glock 22: Its compact design makes it a better option for concealed carry, offering a more manageable profile for everyday carry. While the reduced size might make it slightly less accurate and more prone to recoil, skilled shooters can easily compensate.
Table Summarizing Key Differences:
| Feature | Glock 35 | Glock 22 |
|---|---|---|
| Caliber | .40 S&W | .40 S&W |
| Size | Full-Size | Compact |
| Barrel Length | Longer | Shorter |
| Magazine Capacity | Typically 17 rounds | Typically 15 rounds |
| Weight | Heavier | Lighter |
| Recoil | Less | More |
| Concealed Carry | More Difficult | Easier |
Accuracy and Recoil Management: On the Range
The longer barrel of the Glock 35 translates to improved accuracy, particularly at longer ranges. The heavier weight and larger grip contribute to better recoil management, allowing for faster follow-up shots. However, the Glock 22's manageable size and weight can be advantageous for shooters with smaller hands or those prioritizing maneuverability in close-quarters situations. Ultimately, the "better" gun in terms of accuracy and recoil depends greatly on the shooter's skill and preferences.
Intended Use: Finding the Right Fit
The choice between the Glock 35 and Glock 22 heavily depends on its intended use.
-
Law Enforcement/Duty Use: The Glock 35’s full-size platform provides superior accuracy and control, making it a suitable choice for law enforcement officers.
-
Concealed Carry: The Glock 22’s smaller size and lighter weight make it a better option for concealed carry, particularly for individuals with smaller frames.
-
Home Defense: Both are viable options, though the Glock 35’s accuracy advantage might be beneficial in a home defense scenario.
-
Competition Shooting: The Glock 35’s larger size and longer sight radius could offer an edge in some shooting competitions.
Conclusion: Making the Informed Decision
There’s no single "better" gun between the Glock 35 and Glock 22. The ideal choice hinges on your individual needs and priorities. Carefully consider your intended use, hand size, and shooting experience before making your decision. Consider renting or borrowing both models to test them firsthand before committing to a purchase. This hands-on experience will provide invaluable insight into which pistol better suits your shooting style and overall needs.
