Choosing a subcompact pistol is a serious decision, often involving balancing concealability, reliability, and shootability. Two popular contenders frequently top the list: the Glock 43 and the Ruger EC9s. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which pistol best suits your needs and preferences.
Concealability: A Tie (Almost)
Both the Glock 43 and the Ruger EC9s are designed for concealed carry, boasting remarkably similar dimensions. The Ruger EC9s might have a slightly slimmer profile, making it potentially easier to conceal in tighter clothing. However, the difference is marginal, and the best choice will depend largely on individual body type and preferred carry methods. Ultimately, the difference in concealability is negligible for most users.
Shootability: Where the Differences Emerge
This is where a clearer distinction arises. The Glock 43, with its slightly larger grip and straighter trigger pull, often receives higher marks for shootability. Many shooters find the Glock's grip more comfortable and easier to control, particularly during rapid fire. The Glock's trigger, while having a reputation for a somewhat stiffer pull, is generally more consistent and predictable.
The Ruger EC9s, while manageable, presents a slightly smaller grip, which some find less comfortable, especially for those with larger hands. The trigger pull, while smoother than the Glock's in some instances, can be perceived as less consistent. This can impact accuracy, especially for less experienced shooters.
Reliability: A Tale of Two Titans
Both the Glock 43 and the Ruger EC9s are known for their reliability. Glock has a long-standing reputation for producing extremely reliable firearms, and the 43 lives up to that legacy. Ruger, too, has a strong reputation, and the EC9s generally functions flawlessly. It's difficult to declare a clear winner here; both pistols are built to perform under pressure.
Features and Ergonomics: A Matter of Preference
The Glock 43 features a simple, striker-fired design with minimal external safeties. This is preferred by many for its ease of use and lack of potentially interfering mechanisms. The sights, while basic, are generally sufficient for self-defense purposes.
The Ruger EC9s offers a slightly different feel. Its lightweight design, while beneficial for concealability, can also contribute to more noticeable recoil. The sights are also a point of discussion, with some users preferring the Glock's more robust offering.
Ammunition Capacity: A Slight Edge to the Glock
The Glock 43 holds six rounds in the magazine, while the Ruger EC9s holds seven. This extra round is a small but potentially significant advantage for the Ruger, offering slightly more firepower in a self-defense situation. However, the difference is often negligible compared to other factors.
Price: Often a Close Call
Pricing can vary depending on retailer and availability, but generally, the Glock 43 and Ruger EC9s sit in a similar price range. Slight fluctuations are common, so it's best to check current pricing from multiple reputable vendors.
The Verdict: It Depends on You
The "best" pistol between the Glock 43 and Ruger EC9s ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If shootability and a more comfortable grip are priorities, the Glock 43 might be the better choice. If you prioritize maximum concealability and a slightly higher magazine capacity, the Ruger EC9s is a strong contender.
Before making a purchase, it's highly recommended to handle both pistols, if possible, and even try them at a range to determine which one feels best in your hand and fits your shooting style. Consider your hand size, shooting experience, and intended use before making your final decision. Remember, safety training is paramount regardless of your chosen firearm.
