Choosing a concealed carry pistol is a deeply personal decision, demanding careful consideration of various factors. This in-depth comparison of the Glock 43 and the Walther PPS M2 aims to provide you with the information needed to make an informed choice, weighing their strengths and weaknesses against your individual needs and preferences. Both are popular subcompact 9mm handguns known for their concealability, but they offer distinct features and shooting experiences.
Size and Concealability: A Close Race
Both the Glock 43 and Walther PPS M2 excel in concealability, designed for comfortable everyday carry. The Glock 43 boasts a slightly slimmer profile, making it easier to disappear beneath clothing. However, the PPS M2’s slightly shorter overall length and slightly reduced height might offer a more comfortable experience for some users depending on their body type and preferred carry method. The difference is marginal, and the best choice will largely depend on individual hand size and body shape.
Key Dimensions Comparison:
| Feature | Glock 43 | Walther PPS M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length | 6.26 inches | 6.1 inches |
| Height | 4.25 inches | 4.0 inches |
| Width | 1.02 inches | 0.9 inches |
| Weight (empty) | 17.95 ounces | 17.8 ounces |
Ergonomics and Shootability: Distinct Feel and Grip
The Glock 43's grip is noticeably more aggressive, offering a secure hold even with sweaty hands. However, this aggressive texture can be a drawback for some users, feeling abrasive or uncomfortable during extended periods of carry. The Walther PPS M2, on the other hand, provides a smoother, more refined grip, which some shooters find more pleasant. This translates to a subjective difference in shootability, with the Glock 43 favoring a more secure, potentially faster draw and the PPS M2 prioritizing comfort during extended shooting sessions.
Features and Controls: Ambidextrous Options vs. Simplicity
The Glock 43 is celebrated for its simplicity and reliability, featuring a straightforward design with minimal external controls. This contributes to its ease of use and low maintenance. The Walther PPS M2 offers a reversible magazine release, making it more adaptable for left-handed shooters. Both pistols feature a relatively short trigger pull, but the specific trigger feel will vary based on individual preferences and any potential aftermarket modifications.
Ammunition Capacity: A Slight Edge to the PPS M2
While both pistols are designed for concealed carry, the Walther PPS M2 boasts a slightly higher magazine capacity. Standard magazines hold 7 rounds compared to the Glock 43’s 6, offering a small but potentially significant advantage in self-defense scenarios. Extended magazines are available for both pistols, but that increases the overall size and negates some of the concealability advantages of both.
Reliability and Durability: Proven Track Records
Both the Glock 43 and Walther PPS M2 are renowned for their reliability and durability. Glock's reputation for ruggedness and minimal maintenance is well-established. The Walther PPS M2, while perhaps not as widely known for extreme durability testing, maintains a solid reputation for reliability among its users and enthusiasts. Both pistols use high-quality components and are designed to withstand rigorous use.
The Verdict: It Depends on Your Needs
Choosing between the Glock 43 and Walther PPS M2 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and priorities. The Glock 43 excels in its slim profile and aggressive grip, favoring those prioritizing maximum concealability and a secure hold. The Walther PPS M2 offers a slightly more comfortable grip, higher magazine capacity, and an ambidextrous magazine release, making it more appealing to shooters who prioritize comfort, adaptability, and slightly higher capacity. Consider handling both pistols if possible before making a final decision, as the best choice will ultimately be the one that best fits your hand and shooting style.
