The question of whether a bear that kills a human will be hunted down is complex and depends heavily on several factors, including location, the specific circumstances of the attack, and the governing wildlife management policies in the area. There's no single, universal answer.
The Role of Wildlife Management Agencies
Wildlife management agencies (like state fish and wildlife departments in the US or equivalent organizations elsewhere) are responsible for balancing human safety with the conservation of bear populations. Their response to a fatal bear attack is a careful process, not a knee-jerk reaction. They will investigate the attack thoroughly to determine:
Determining the Circumstances of the Attack
- Was the attack predatory or defensive? Predatory attacks, where a bear actively hunts and kills a human, are exceedingly rare. Defensive attacks, where a bear feels threatened and acts to protect itself or its cubs, are far more common. This distinction significantly impacts the agency's response.
- Was the human behaving in a manner that provoked the bear? Lack of proper bear safety precautions, such as storing food improperly or approaching bears too closely, can influence the decision-making process. While tragic, such situations might lead to a different management outcome than an unprovoked attack.
- Can the bear be identified? Successfully identifying the responsible bear is crucial. This might involve tracking, witness accounts, and forensic evidence. If the bear cannot be identified, hunting it becomes impossible.
Agency Response: Hunting or Other Management Strategies
Depending on the investigation's findings, the agency might choose one of several actions:
- Lethal Removal: In cases of confirmed predatory attacks or repeated instances of aggressive behavior, lethal removal (hunting the bear) may be deemed necessary for public safety. This is a last resort and a decision made after careful consideration of all factors.
- Relocation: Relocation, while seemingly a more humane option, often carries its own risks. Relocated bears may struggle to adapt to a new environment, leading to increased stress and potential conflicts with humans in the new location. Its effectiveness is debated among wildlife professionals.
- Increased Public Education: Regardless of the action taken regarding the bear, increased public awareness campaigns about bear safety and coexistence are typically implemented.
Regional Differences in Policy
The approach taken can vary significantly between regions and countries. Some areas have stricter regulations regarding lethal removal of bears, emphasizing non-lethal methods whenever possible. Others might prioritize human safety and take a more proactive approach to lethal control in cases of confirmed attacks.
The Emotional Toll
Fatal bear attacks are extraordinarily rare events. The emotional impact on the community and the family of the victim is significant. The management agency's response must balance the need for public safety with the sensitivity surrounding such tragedies.
Conclusion
In summary, while a bear that kills a human may be hunted down, it's not an automatic consequence. A thorough investigation is always conducted first to determine the circumstances of the attack and the best course of action for both public safety and responsible wildlife management. The decision is complex, carefully considered, and varies regionally. It’s essential to remember that preventative measures, such as practicing bear safety, significantly reduce the risk of such incidents occurring in the first place.
