Choosing a handgun, especially for concealed carry, is a deeply personal decision. Two dominant players in the market consistently top the lists of preferred firearms: the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19. Both are reliable, popular, and readily available, but which one reigns supreme? This in-depth comparison will explore the key features, differences, and considerations to help you make an informed choice.
Key Features & Specifications: A Side-by-Side Look
Before diving into the specifics, let's lay out the foundational features of each pistol. This table provides a quick overview of their key specifications.
| Feature | Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 | Glock 19 |
|---|---|---|
| Caliber | 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP | 9mm, .357 SIG, .40 S&W |
| Capacity | 15+1 (9mm), 14+1 (.40 S&W), 10+1 (.45 ACP) | 15+1 (9mm), 15+1 (.357 SIG), 15+1 (.40 S&W) |
| Weight (unloaded) | Varies by caliber | ~23.2 oz (9mm) |
| Length | ~7.3 inches | ~7.36 inches |
| Barrel Length | ~4 inches | ~4.02 inches |
| Trigger | Improved trigger pull | Consistent, somewhat stiff trigger |
| Grips | Interchangeable backstraps | Textured polymer |
| Price | Varies | Varies |
Ergonomics and Handling: Comfort and Control
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 boasts an ambidextrous slide release and a more refined trigger. Its interchangeable backstraps allow for customized grip adjustment, catering to a wider range of hand sizes. This makes it extremely comfortable for extended shooting sessions and allows for a more secure grip, crucial for accuracy.
The Glock 19, known for its rugged simplicity, features a consistent, if somewhat stiff, trigger pull. Its aggressive texturing provides a positive grip, but may be less comfortable for some users with smaller hands. The lack of ambidextrous controls can be a drawback for left-handed shooters.
Accuracy and Reliability: On the Range
Both the M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19 have a reputation for reliability. Thousands of rounds can be fired without significant issues. Accuracy is also comparable, with both pistols offering sufficient precision for self-defense and target shooting. Ultimately, the shooter's skill is the largest determinant of accuracy.
Trigger Differences: A Crucial Consideration
A notable difference lies in the trigger. The M&P 2.0's trigger is generally considered smoother and more refined than the Glock 19's. This can translate to improved accuracy, especially for those accustomed to lighter trigger pulls. However, the Glock 19's trigger is renowned for its consistency, which some shooters prefer.
Concealed Carry Considerations: Size, Weight, and Profile
The Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 are both popular choices for concealed carry due to their relatively compact size and manageable weight. The difference in dimensions is negligible, making either a viable option depending on individual preference and body type. Consider factors like holster compatibility and comfort during extended wear when making your decision.
The Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?
Choosing between the S&W M&P 2.0 and the Glock 19 depends heavily on individual preferences. There's no single "best" pistol.
Choose the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 if:
- You prioritize a more comfortable grip and adjustable backstraps.
- You prefer a smoother, more refined trigger pull.
- Ambidextrous controls are important to you.
Choose the Glock 19 if:
- You prefer a simpler, more rugged design with fewer moving parts.
- You want a pistol known for its unwavering reliability and consistent trigger pull.
- Cost is a primary factor (although prices fluctuate).
Ultimately, the best way to make this decision is to rent or borrow both pistols and test them out at a range. This allows you to experience the differences firsthand and determine which firearm better suits your shooting style, comfort level, and needs. This hands-on approach will make your decision far more confident and satisfying.
