Choosing between the Savage 64 and the Ruger 10/22 is a common dilemma for many rimfire enthusiasts. Both are incredibly popular .22 LR rifles renowned for their reliability and accuracy, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences. This in-depth comparison will delve into the key features, pros, and cons of each rifle, helping you make an informed decision.
Accuracy and Performance
Both rifles are capable of impressive accuracy, but their designs lead to subtle differences. The Ruger 10/22, with its robust receiver and generally well-regarded barrel, offers consistent accuracy suitable for plinking, small game hunting, and even some informal target shooting. Its accuracy is further enhanced by the vast aftermarket support, allowing for upgrades like match-grade barrels and triggers.
The Savage 64, on the other hand, utilizes Savage's renowned AccuTrigger system. This adjustable trigger is often praised for its crisp, light pull, significantly contributing to improved accuracy, especially for those new to .22 LR rifles. While the factory barrel is reliable, the aftermarket support for the Savage 64 is not as extensive as the 10/22's.
Winner: While both are accurate, the Savage 64's AccuTrigger gives it a slight edge for precision shooting, particularly for those prioritizing a clean, predictable trigger pull.
Ergonomics and Handling
The Ruger 10/22 boasts a simple, classic design that's comfortable for most shooters. Its ergonomics are generally well-regarded, though some users might find the stock a bit basic, especially for longer shooting sessions.
The Savage 64 often receives positive feedback for its comfortable stock, particularly the synthetic models. The rifle's overall balance and handling are generally considered excellent, contributing to a pleasant shooting experience.
Winner: The Savage 64 slightly edges out the 10/22 in ergonomics due to its often more comfortable stock design and overall handling.
Customization and Aftermarket Support
This is where the Ruger 10/22 truly shines. Decades of popularity have resulted in an enormous aftermarket ecosystem. Finding replacement parts, upgrades, custom stocks, barrels, triggers, and accessories is incredibly easy and affordable. This allows for extensive customization to tailor the rifle to individual preferences and shooting disciplines.
The Savage 64, while having a growing aftermarket, pales in comparison to the 10/22's extensive options. While some upgrades are available, the choice is significantly more limited.
Winner: The Ruger 10/22 wins decisively in terms of aftermarket support and customization options.
Price and Value
Both rifles are generally budget-friendly, offering excellent value for their price. The Ruger 10/22 is often slightly more expensive due to its long-standing popularity and extensive aftermarket. The Savage 64 typically provides a more competitive price point, making it an attractive entry-level option.
Winner: The Savage 64 generally offers better value for money due to its lower initial cost.
Reliability and Durability
Both the Ruger 10/22 and the Savage 64 are known for their reliability. They are durable and designed to withstand regular use. Both are excellent choices for dependable rimfire performance.
Winner: A tie. Both rifles are exceptionally reliable.
Conclusion
The choice between the Savage 64 and the Ruger 10/22 ultimately depends on individual needs and priorities. The Ruger 10/22 excels in its unparalleled aftermarket support and widespread availability, making it ideal for those who want extensive customization options. The Savage 64, on the other hand, offers a more affordable entry point with an excellent factory trigger and comfortable ergonomics, making it a strong contender for beginners and those seeking a reliable, accurate rifle out of the box. Carefully consider your budget, desired level of customization, and shooting style before making your decision.
